CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901 — Page 266

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

December 25 for de facto non grata,

284

better that each country should provide for casual paupers and imbecile Foreigners. The German Government have since declined to repatriate German paupers on the ground that this country afforded no reciprocity.

In view of these circumstances Lord Lansdowne does not consider that His Majesty's Government could with propriety call upon the German Government to repatriate Ahrens from Hong Kong notwithstanding that the laws of that Colony may permit the removal of persons therefrom.

On the other hand it was argued in 1891 in the case of Italy, with which country a similar understanding exists, that the arrangement did not apply to the Colonies, and the Italian Government were therefore requested to repatriate an Italian lunatic from Hong Kong. The Italian Government replied that they considered that pauper lunatics were customarily maintained in the country where they resided. It was subsequently urged that there was no proper accommodation at Hong Kong for incurable lunatics and the Italian Government eventually consented to receive the lunatic in question if repatriated at the cost of the Colony.

The German Government were also, under similar circumstances, requested to allow the repatriation of a German lunatic from Hong Kong at the expense of the Colony, the hope being expressed that under the circumstances the German Government would not take exception to this course, but before an answer was received, the German Ambassador was informed that arrangements had been made for the disposal of the lunatic which rendered repatriation unnecessary.

In view of the foregoing facts it appears to Lord Lansdowne to be open to His Majesty's Government to appeal to the German Government in the case of Ahrens, as was done in the similar case above referred to in 1893, on the grounds then urged of the want of accommodation, but in view of the understanding come to in 1872 His Majesty's Government could scarcely do more.

I am to enquire whether in these circumstances Mr.

Edit History

2026-06-01 04:36:33 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
December 25 for de facto non grata, 284 better that each country should provide for casual paupers and imbecile Foreigners. The German Government have since declined to repatriate German paupers on the ground that this country afforded no reciprocity. In view of these circumstances Lord Lansdowne does not consider that His Majesty's Government could with propriety call upon the German Government to repatriate Ahrens from Hong Kong notwithstanding that the laws of that Colony may permit the removal of persons therefrom. On the other hand it was argued in 1891 in the case of Italy, with which country a similar understanding exists, that the arrangement did not apply to the Colonies, and the Italian Government were therefore requested to repatriate an Italian lunatic from Hong Kong. The Italian Government replied that they considered that pauper lunatics were customarily maintained in the country where they resided. It was subsequently urged that there was no proper accommodation at Hong Kong for incurable lunatics and the Italian Government eventually consented to receive the lunatic in question if repatriated at the cost of the Colony. The German Government were also, under similar circumstances, requested to allow the repatriation of a German lunatic from Hong Kong at the expense of the Colony, the hope being expressed that under the circumstances the German Government would not take exception to this course, but before an answer was received, the German Ambassador was informed that arrangements had been made for the disposal of the lunatic which rendered repatriation unnecessary. In view of the foregoing facts it appears to Lord Lansdowne to be open to His Majesty's Government to appeal to the German Government in the case of Ahrens, as was done in the similar case above referred to in 1893, on the grounds then urged of the want of accommodation, but in view of the understanding come to in 1872 His Majesty's Government could scarcely do more. I am to enquire whether in these circumstances Mr.
Baseline (Original)
Dejanatan 25 for bede en grata, 284 better that each country should provide for casual paupers and imbecile Foreigners. The German Government have since declined to repatriate German paupers on the ground that this country afforded no reciprocity. In view of these circumstances Lord Lansdowne does not consider that His Majesty's Government could with propriety call upon the Ger- man Government to repatriate Ahrens from Hong Kong notwithstanding that the laws of that Colony may permit the removal of persons therefrom. On the other hand it was argued in 1891 in the case of Italy, with which country a similar under- standing exists, that the arrangement did not apply to the Colonies, and the Italian Government were therefore requested to repatriate an Italian lunatic The Italian Government replied from Hong Kong. that they considered that pauper lunatics were customarily maintained in the country where they resided. It was subsequently urged that there was no proper accommodation at Hong Kong for incurable lunatics and the Italian Government eventually con- sented ( consented to receive the lunatic in question if repatriated at the cost of the Colony. The German Government were also, under / similar circumstances, requested to allow the repatriation of a German lunatic from Hong Kong at the expense of the Colony, the hope being expressed that under the circumstances the German Government would not take exception to this course, but before an answer was received, the German Ambassador was informed that arrangements had been made for the disposal of the lunatic which rendered repatriation unnecessary. In view of the foregoing facts it appears to Lord Lansdowne to be open to His Majesty's Govern- ment to appeal to the German Government in the case of Ahrens, as was done in the similar case above referred to in 1893, on the grounds then urged of the want of accommodation, but in view of the under- standing come to in 1872 His Majesty's Government could scarcely do more. I am to enquire whether in these circumstances Mr.
2026-06-01 04:36:33 · Baseline
View content

Dejanatan 25 for bede en grata,

284

better that each country should provide for casual

paupers and imbecile Foreigners. The German

Government have since declined to repatriate German

paupers on the ground that this country afforded no

reciprocity.

In view of these circumstances Lord

Lansdowne does not consider that His Majesty's

Government could with propriety call upon the Ger-

man Government to repatriate Ahrens from Hong Kong

notwithstanding that the laws of that Colony may

permit the removal of persons therefrom.

On the other hand it was argued in 1891 in the

case of Italy, with which country a similar under-

standing exists, that the arrangement did not apply

to the Colonies, and the Italian Government were

therefore requested to repatriate an Italian lunatic

The Italian Government replied

from Hong Kong.

that they considered that pauper lunatics were customarily maintained in the country where they resided. It was subsequently urged that there was no proper accommodation at Hong Kong for incurable lunatics and the Italian Government eventually con-

sented

(

consented to receive the lunatic in question if

repatriated at the cost of the Colony.

The German Government were also, under

/

similar circumstances, requested to allow the

repatriation of a German lunatic from Hong Kong at

the expense of the Colony, the hope being expressed

that under the circumstances the German Government

would not take exception to this course, but before

an answer was received, the German Ambassador was

informed that arrangements had been made for the

disposal of the lunatic which rendered repatriation

unnecessary.

In view of the foregoing facts it appears to

Lord Lansdowne to be open to His Majesty's Govern-

ment to appeal to the German Government in the case

of Ahrens, as was done in the similar case above

referred to in 1893, on the grounds then urged of

the want of accommodation, but in view of the under-

standing come to in 1872 His Majesty's Government

could scarcely do more.

I am to enquire whether in these circumstances

Mr.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.